Threat & NorthKoreaThreat
We can’t skip the ‘China Threat’ and ‘NorthKoreaThreat’ in dealing with US’s strategy toward Northeast Asia. China Threat has risen to the surface after Bush Administration. And the objective is ‘policy switch toward East Asia’ and ‘readjustment of US forces in East Asia’. Especially, ‘U.S.-China Security Review’ points to their fear for Ch
threat due to high oil prices and domestic pressure
Existence of longstanding American Nuclear threats against NorthKorea
→ It self direct violation of international non-proliferation regime
(B) Failure to pay attention to conciliatory NorthKorean gestures
(C) Insistence upon Cold War perception – dualistic and militaristic
(ex) hawk engagement VS nuclear brinkmansh
Analyzing the event of NorthKorea Collapse
Suggesting different diplomatic strategy and relations of foreign countries
and counter-plan of government of South Korea
Finding the role of U.N. in the event of NorthKorea Collapse and its nation reconstruction
Facts about recent NorthKorea
response plans of the NorthKorea Collapse in the aspects of diplomacy and military affairs
focus on
Ⅰ. Introduction
1. Purpose of Research
The following are the main purposes of this research: analyzing the event of NorthKorea Collapse and the following scenarios which were assumed by scholars, suggesting different diplomatic strategy and relations of foreign countries and counter-plan of government of South Korea, and finding the role of U.N. in the event of NorthKorea Collapse and i
from that of post-1986 Vietnam. For example, Vietnamese and NorthKorean foreign policies have had little in common in the last two decades, and this difference may have been interrelated with the dramatic contrast between Vietnam's economic boom and NorthKorea's recurrent setbacks. This subject is certainly worth investigating, since many of NorthKorea's current problems - inflation, high mi
Ⅰ. 부시행정부의 안보전략
부시는 러시아가 더 이상 미국의 적이 아니라고 선언했다. 그의 안보팀은 또한 동구의 주요 구 공산국가들이 NATO로 편입되었고, 다른 구 소비에트 블록 국가들이 이러한 전철을 따르려 한다는 사실에 비추어 볼 때 “유럽에서의 대규모 전쟁은 최소 한 세대 동안은 상상할
[Partnership Relations within 19Years]
Three Stages in these Comprehensive Relations:
Developing good relations
Both countries are significant regional power,
and shares the common peaceful co-existence
[Prospects of Two Countries Relationship]
- POLITICALLY
Total mutual cooperative relationship
Mediator of NK’s nuclear issue
The actor of the Korea peninsula pro
Raises a question about the bottle cap role
->> Lead to an arms races
1. U.S.
- Grand strategy containing the rising power of China
Refer Japan as Britain in Far East (Armitage report, 2000)
2. Japan
- Using the US encouragement on the normalization
Financial support for U.S.
3. Unstable environment
- Rising China and NK’s nuclear threat (Armitage report, 2007)
Pre- Gorbachev Soviet- Vietnames Discord
To answer the aforesaid question, we need evidence, above all, from the vietnamese and Russian archives, but it may also be useful to study the declassified reports of the East European Communist diplomats who were accredited to Hanoi in the 1980s. Namely, the Hungarian diplomats whose reports I read managed to collect an impressive amount of confiden
Various ways to handle NK nuclear weapons
1. Diplomatic efforts
Supporting 6-party talks
Ineffectiveness:
-NK’s violation of UN resolution
-Missile testing & underground nuclear test
3. Multinational approach
involving and consulting
with 6 party talks countries
working on a "very clear
resolution condemning
NorthKorea's actions”
Forceful response form
China and R